“Let’s scrub out that tan” is a common refrain in beauty parlours in India, where girls grow up with constant reminders that only fair skin is beautiful.
From Sunday classified ads touting the marriageability of an “MBA graduate. 5- ft. English medium. Fair complexion” to elderly aunties advising young women to apply saffron paste to “maintain your skin whiter and smoother”, the signs are everywhere.
Even sentiments like, “She got lucky he married her despite her [dark] complexion” are still whispered around India in 2017.
Younger generations are now starting to push back. On July 7, 18-year-old Aranya Johar published her Brown Girl’s Guide to Beauty on Youtube. The video, a spoken-word poem containing lines like “Forget snow-white/say hello to chocolate brown/I’ll write my own fairy-tale” went viral, reaching 1.5 million viewers around the world in its first day alone.
Johar’s candid slam came just beforeBollywood actor Nawazuddin Siddiquiused Twitter to indict the Indian film industry’s racist culture.
His post recalled the vehement pushback of actress Tannishtha Chatterjee, who waswas bulliedfor her skin tone on live TV in 2016.
Though many Indians stillfeign ignoranceabout social discrimination based on skin colour, the country’s obsession with whiteness can also be violent. In recent years, fear of black and brown skin has also spurred harassment and attacks onAfrican students living in India.
Why do Indians so hate their own colour?
The bleaching syndrome
Indian history offers some answers.
Throughoutmedieval and modern history, the Indian subcontinent has been on the radar of various European settlers and traders, including, from the 15th to 17th centuries, the Portuguese, Dutch and French. The subcontinent was invaded and partly ruled by the Mughals in the 16th century, and colonised by the British from the 17th century onwards until independence in 1947. All these foreign “visitors” were ofrelatively fair complexion, and many claimed to be superior.
Being subject to a succession of white(ish) overlords has long associated light skin with power, status and desirability among Indians. Today, the contempt for brown skin is embraced by both the ruling class and lower castes, and reinforced daily by beauty magazine covers that feature almost exclusively Caucasian, often foreign, models.
It’s been the dark man’s burden in this majority-non-white nation to desire a westernised concept of beauty, and post-colonial activism has not been able to change this.
According to a study we conducted from 2013 to 2016, 70% of the 300 women and men we interviewed reported wanting a date or partner with someone who had light skin. This colourism is what pushes so many Indians to lighten their skin, creating a phenomenon termed “bleaching syndrome“.
Bleaching syndrome is not a superficial fashion, it’s a strategy of assimilating a superior identity that reflects a deep-set belief that fair skin is better, more powerful, prettier. And it’s not limited to India; skin bleaching is also common inthe rest of Asiaandin Africa.
A thriving bleaching market
Aninventive and growing marketof creams and salves has cropped up to fill this demand, which now pulls in overUS$400 million dollars annually.
Some of the most widely-sold products include Fem, Lotus, Fair and Lovely and its gendered-equivalent Fair and Handsome. Most of these appealingly named creams are in facta dangerous cocktailof steroids, hydroquinone, and tretinoin, the long-term use of which can lead to health concerns like permanent pigmentation, skin cancer, liver damage and mercury poisoning among other things.
Nonetheless, a 2014 marketing study found thatalmost 90% of Indian girls cite skin lightening as a “high need”. These young women are willing to overlook theafter-effects of bleaching, and the advent ofonline salesallows them to use these products in the privacy of their own homes.
Initially focused on feminine beauty, the fairness creams market now alsocaters to Indian men. Products marketed to menpromiseto fight sweat, give them fairer underarms and attract women.
And Bollywood stars with huge followings, including Shahrukh Khan and John Abraham, regularlyendorse and promote skin bleaches.
The brand Clean and Dry took bleaching to new levels in 2012, when it began heavily advertising for a new wash tolighten the vagina.
This time, women hadhad enough. In 2013, the activist groupWomen of Worthlaunched theirDark is Beautiful campaign, which was endorsed by the Indian theatre actress Nandita Sen.
With other feminist groups, the women compelled the Advertising Standards Council of India to issueguidelines in 2014 statingthat “ads should not reinforce negative social stereotyping on the basis of skin colour” or “portray people with darker skin [as]…inferior, or unsuccessful in any aspect of life particularly in relation to being attractive to the opposite sex”.
This guidance is in keeping withthe Indian Constitution, which provides for equality for all (article 14) and prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth (article 15).
Unfortunately, the law can do little to stop the subtler forms of racism and bigotry present in Indian society. And, to date, that vagina bleaching product is stillon the market.
The “bleaching syndrome” goes far beyond skin colour, with Indian women also questioning their hair texture and colour, speech, marital choices and dress style, raising real concerns about female self-esteem.
As Aranya Johar rhymed on Youtube, “With the hope of being able someday to love another/let’s begin by being our own first lovers”.
Neha Mishra, Assistant Professor of Law,Reva University of BangaloreandRonald Hall, Professor of Social Work,Michigan State University
This article was originally published onThe Conversation. Read theoriginal article.